<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Mac OS X Browsers: Javascript Performance Shootout</title> <atom:link href="http://www.manu-j.com/blog/mac-os-x-browsers-javascript-performance-shootout/310/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.manu-j.com/blog/mac-os-x-browsers-javascript-performance-shootout/310/</link> <description>Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. - Clarke&#039;s Third Law</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: MAC OS X &#187; Chrome在Mac系统上的表现已超越Safari</title><link>http://www.manu-j.com/blog/mac-os-x-browsers-javascript-performance-shootout/310/comment-page-1/#comment-1634</link> <dc:creator>MAC OS X &#187; Chrome在Mac系统上的表现已超越Safari</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 07:27:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.manu-j.com/blog/?p=310#comment-1634</guid> <description>[...] 这一次Opera没有参与对比，原因是实在没有可比性，上一次测试就输得很惨。很遗憾，Opera再一次被无视了! [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 这一次Opera没有参与对比，原因是实在没有可比性，上一次测试就输得很惨。很遗憾，Opera再一次被无视了! [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chrome速度,Safari4,firefox3.5,chrome3 &#124; 谷歌Chrome中文站</title><link>http://www.manu-j.com/blog/mac-os-x-browsers-javascript-performance-shootout/310/comment-page-1/#comment-1594</link> <dc:creator>Chrome速度,Safari4,firefox3.5,chrome3 &#124; 谷歌Chrome中文站</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:14:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.manu-j.com/blog/?p=310#comment-1594</guid> <description>[...] 这一次Opera没有参与对比，原因是实在没有可比性，上一次测试就输得很惨。很遗憾，Opera再一次被无视了! [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 这一次Opera没有参与对比，原因是实在没有可比性，上一次测试就输得很惨。很遗憾，Opera再一次被无视了! [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Safari vs Firefox vs Chrome on Mac: Chome Wins!</title><link>http://www.manu-j.com/blog/mac-os-x-browsers-javascript-performance-shootout/310/comment-page-1/#comment-1591</link> <dc:creator>Safari vs Firefox vs Chrome on Mac: Chome Wins!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:26:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.manu-j.com/blog/?p=310#comment-1591</guid> <description>[...] a month back, I had done a comparison of javascript performance on the latest available betas of various Mac OS X browsers. Chrome edged out Safari narrowly in the [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a month back, I had done a comparison of javascript performance on the latest available betas of various Mac OS X browsers. Chrome edged out Safari narrowly in the [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Patrick</title><link>http://www.manu-j.com/blog/mac-os-x-browsers-javascript-performance-shootout/310/comment-page-1/#comment-1450</link> <dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:02:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.manu-j.com/blog/?p=310#comment-1450</guid> <description>Hi Manu,eventually the changes in WebKit will find its way into Safari but Apple seems to be very conservative in updating Safari (read: &quot;merging WebKit&#039;s changes into their version of the browser&quot;), so I can understand your decision after reading your reasoning, as the current changes will likely not make it into Safari 4.Greetings</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Manu,</p><p>eventually the changes in WebKit will find its way into Safari but Apple seems to be very conservative in updating Safari (read: &#8220;merging WebKit&#8217;s changes into their version of the browser&#8221;), so I can understand your decision after reading your reasoning, as the current changes will likely not make it into Safari 4.</p><p>Greetings</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: manu</title><link>http://www.manu-j.com/blog/mac-os-x-browsers-javascript-performance-shootout/310/comment-page-1/#comment-1448</link> <dc:creator>manu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:02:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.manu-j.com/blog/?p=310#comment-1448</guid> <description>I have updated the post with my reasoning as to why I chose Safari Beta instead of webkit nightly.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have updated the post with my reasoning as to why I chose Safari Beta instead of webkit nightly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: billy bob</title><link>http://www.manu-j.com/blog/mac-os-x-browsers-javascript-performance-shootout/310/comment-page-1/#comment-1446</link> <dc:creator>billy bob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.manu-j.com/blog/?p=310#comment-1446</guid> <description>I agree with Patrick.You should specifiy which version of Safari/ WebKit you used.  If it&#039;s the public Beta on Apple website from several months ago against a current nightly - the results might be off some.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Patrick.</p><p>You should specifiy which version of Safari/ WebKit you used.  If it&#8217;s the public Beta on Apple website from several months ago against a current nightly &#8211; the results might be off some.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Patrick</title><link>http://www.manu-j.com/blog/mac-os-x-browsers-javascript-performance-shootout/310/comment-page-1/#comment-1421</link> <dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:26:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.manu-j.com/blog/?p=310#comment-1421</guid> <description>Hi Manu,as you were using the latest nightly of Chromium, I would suggest that you also use the latest nightly of WebKit in conjunction with the beta version of Safari 4.Greetings</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Manu,</p><p>as you were using the latest nightly of Chromium, I would suggest that you also use the latest nightly of WebKit in conjunction with the beta version of Safari 4.</p><p>Greetings</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/15 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached

Served from: Ubuntu-710-gutsy-32-minimal @ 2010-03-11 19:53:39 -->